Lógos, éthos and pathos in communication in business. The example of the Assessment Center/Development Center method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2023.2.6

Keywords:

Assessment Center/Development Center, assessment conversation, logos, ethos, pathos, communication in business, leadership, communication schemes

Abstract

The article addresses the presence of logos, ethos, and pathos in business conversational patterns. The Assessment Center/Development Center (AC/DC) method is presented as an example of a communication approach in the business context (between supervisor and employee) that incorporates this rhetorical triad. A conversation evaluation scheme aimed at assessing the employee’s performance and motivating them to develop their skills and qualifications serves as an illustrative example of this method. The article begins by introducing the terminological framework related to the classical triad of logos, ethos, and pathos. It then discusses the distinction between business communication and communication in the business context. Considering the differences between external and internal communication, the AC/DC method is discussed as an example of how to effectively manage a company's internal communication. The presentation of the conversation evaluation scheme (falling within the realm of providing constructive feedback and employing motivational practices, also known as reinforcement) provided guidelines for its implementation.

References

Alon, Albert, Douglas W. Bray, William C. Byham, Deidra J. Schleicher. 2015. „Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operations”. Journal of Management 41(4). DOI: 10.1177/0149206314567780.

Arystoteles. 2004. Retoryka. Retoryka dla Aleksandra. Poetyka, przekł. Henryk Podbielski. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Bokacki, Robert St. 2014. Leadership tool box – ludzki kontekst przywództwa, Warszawa: Kontekst HR International Group.

Brim, Brian, Kelly Bacon. 2022. Engaging On-Site Workers: 7 Keys to Promoting Retention, https://www.gallup.com/workplace/404978/engaging-site-workers-keys-promoting-retention.aspx [data dostępu: 12.12.2022].

Budzyńska, Katarzyna, Barbara Konat, Marcin Koszowy. 2016. „Korpusowe metody badania logosu i etosu.” Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa, 3 (209): 385–404.

Communication barriers in the modern workplace. 2018. The Economist Intelligence Unit, https://impact.economist.com/perspectives/sites/default/files/EIU_Lucidchart-Communication%20barriers%20in%20the%20modern%20workplace.pdf [data dostępu: 10.12.2022].

Heathfield, Susan M. 2021. "Beyond Hiring and Firing: What is HR Management?". The Balance. https://www.thebalancemoney.com/what-is-human-resource-management-1918143 [data dostępu: 10.12.2022].

Kaplan, Robert. M., Denise P. Saccuzzo. 2017. Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues. 9th edit. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Keevy, James, Borhene Chakroun. 2015. „Level-setting and recognition of learning outcomes: The use of level descriptors in the twenty-first century”. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000242887 [data dostępu: 10.12.2022].

Korolko, Mirosław. 1990. Sztuka retoryki. Przewodnik encyklopedyczny. Warszawa, Wiedza Powszechna.

Lipowska, Joanna. 2013. „Rozmowa oceniająca – studia nad współczesnymi wytycznymi”, Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi 5(94): 100–112.

Pelak, Kamila. 2009. „Rozmowa oceniająca”, Przegląd Naukowo-Metodyczny. Edukacja dla Bezpieczeństwa 1: 85–88.

Rozmowa oceniająca #1. s.a. https://www.dobrytrener.pl/rozmowa-oceniajaca-1 [data dostępu: 10.12.2022].

Types of business communication. 2021. https://www.grammarly.com/business/learn/types-of-business-communication [data dostępu: 11.12.2022]

Wąsowska-Bąk, Katarzyna, Dorota Górecka, Marzena Mazur. 2012. Assessment/Development Center. Poznaj najskuteczniejszą metodę oceny kompetencji pracowników i kandydatów do pracy. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo „Helion”.

Published

2023-07-01

How to Cite

Kiereś-Łach, Joanna Magdalena. 2023. “Lógos, éthos and Pathos in Communication in Business. The Example of the Assessment Center/Development Center Method”. Res Rhetorica 10 (2):105-18. https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2023.2.6.