Inventing local rhetorics: Towards a topographic critical praxis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2022.4.1Abstrakt
Niniejszy esej proponuje przyjęcie pluralistycznej koncepcji „lokalnych retoryk”. Tradycyjne ujęcia lokalności zwykle poprzestają na traktowaniu jej jako płaskiej przestrzeni lub tła sytuacyjnego dla retoryki lub dyskursu, a w najlepszym przypadku jako wymiaru kontekstu wpisanego w model sytuacji retorycznej. Historia użycia terminu „lokalny” – z jego konotacją stałości, nieruchomości, dookreślenia przestrzennego – przyczyniła się do zaniedbania rozważań teoretycznych z jego użyciem w badaniach retorycznych. A tymczasem użycie „lokalności” w praktyce retorycznej rozwinęło się zgodnie ze zwrotem ku metodologiom terenowym. Opierając się na pracach terenowych na temat retoryczności miejsc katastrof w celu zapoczątkowania refleksji teoretycznej, niniejsze studium proponuje konceptualizację retoryk lokalnych, która jest konstytuowana przez wiele ontologii i teorii retorycznych. W eseju omawia się podejście retoryczno-topograficzne jako orientację metodologiczną, która może integrować istniejące teoretyczne i metodologiczne ścieżki dociekań na temat wielowymiarowej retoryczności tego, co lokalne.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.
Bengtsson, Mette, Kristine Marie Berg, and Stefan Iversen. 2020. Retorik og metode. 1. udgave. Medier, kommunikation, journalistik 15. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Blair, Carole. 2001. “Reflections on Criticism and Bodies: Parables from Public Places”. Western Journal of Communication 65 (3): 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310109374706.
Carpentier, Nico. 2017. The Discursive-Material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. New York: Peter Lang.
Chirindo, Kundai. 2016. “Rhetorical Places: From Classical Topologies to Prospects for Post-Westphalian Spatialities”. Women’s Studies in Communication 39 (2): 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1176787.
Conley, Donovan, and Greg Dickinson. 2010. “Textural Democracy”. Critical Studies in Media Communication 27 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030903557261.
Cram, E. 2016. “Feeling Cartography”. Women’s Studies in Communication 39 (2): 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1176814.
DeChaine, D. Robert. 2012. Border Rhetorics: Citizenship and Identity on the US-Mexico Frontier. Tuscaloosa, Ala: University of Alabama Press.
Dickinson, Greg. 2020. “Space, Place, and the Textures of Rhetorical Criticism”. Western Journal of Communication 84 (3): 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1672886.
Dickinson, Greg, and Giorgia Aiello. 2016. “Being Through There Matters: Materiality, Bodies, and Movement in Urban Communication Research”. International Journal of Communication 10: 1294–1308.
Dickinson, Greg, Carole Blair, and Brian L. Ott. 2010. Places of Public Memory, the Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials. Tuscaloosa, Ala: University of Alabama Press.
Druschke, Caroline Gottschalk. 2019. “A Trophic Future for Rhetorical Ecologies”. Enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture 28 (1), https://www.enculturation.net/a-trophic-future
Druschke, Caroline Gottschalk, and Bridie McGreavy. 2016. “Why Rhetoric Matters for Ecology”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14 (1): 46–52.
Edbauer, Jenny. 2005. “Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 (4): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391320.
Edbauer (Rice), Jenny. 2018. “Unframing Models of Public Distribution 1: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies”. In Fifty Years of Rhetoric Society Quarterly, edited by Joshua Gunn and Diane Davis, 165–182. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108889-16.
Endres, Danielle, Aaron Hess, Samantha Senda-Cook, and Michael K. Middleton. 2016. “In Situ Rhetoric: Intersections Between Qualitative Inquiry, Fieldwork, and Rhetoric”. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616655820.
Endres, Danielle, and Samantha Senda-Cook. 2011. “Location Matters: The Rhetoric of Place in Protest”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 97 (3): 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2011.585167.
Ewalt, Joshua P. 2011. “Mapping Injustice: The World Is Witness, Place-Framing, and the Politics of Viewing on Google Earth”. Communication, Culture and Critique 4 (4): 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2011.01109.x.
Ewalt, Joshua P. 2016. “The Agency of the Spatial”. Women’s Studies in Communication 39 (2): 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1176788.
Ewalt, Joshua. 2017. “Mapping and Spatial Studies”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.651.
Gamble, Christopher N., and Joshua S. Hanan. 2016. “Figures of Entanglement: Special Issue Introduction”. Review of Communication 16 (4): 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2016.1221992.
Graham, S. Scott. 2016. “Object-Oriented Ontology’s Binary Duplication and the Promise of Thing-Oriented Ontologies”. In Rhetoric, through Everyday Things, ed. by Scot Barnett and Casey Andrew Boyle, 108–124. Tuscaloosa, Ala: University of Alabama Press.
Greene, Ronald W., and Kevin D. Kuswa. 2012. “‘From the Arab Spring to Athens, from Occupy Wall Street to Moscow’: Regional Accents and the Rhetorical Cartography of Power”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 42 (3): 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2012.682846.
Hayes, Heather Ashley. 2016. Violent Subjects and Rhetorical Cartography in the Age of the Terror Wars. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hroch, Miloš, and Nico Carpentier. 2021. “Beyond the Meaning of Zines: A Case Study of the Role of Materiality in Four Prague-Based Zine Assemblages”. Communication, Culture and Critique, 14(2): 252–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcab001.
Leff, Michael. 1986. “Textual Criticism: The Legacy of G. P. Mohrmann”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 72 (4): 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638609383783.
Lewis, Tiffany. 2019. “Mapping Social Movements and Leveraging the U.S. West: The Rhetoric of the Woman Suffrage Map”. Women’s Studies in Communication 42 (4): 490–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2019.1676349.
McAlister, Joan Faber. 2016. “Ten Propositions for Communication Scholars Studying Space and Place”. Women’s Studies in Communication 39 (2): 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1176785.
McGreavy, Bridie, Justine Wells, George F. McHendry, and Samantha Senda-Cook. 2018. Tracing Rhetoric and Material Life, Ecological Approaches. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
McKinnon, Sara L., Robert Asen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard. 2016. Text + Field, Innovations in Rhetorical Method. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Middleton, Michael K., Aaron Hess, Danielle Endres, and Samantha Senda-Cook. 2015. Participatory Critical Rhetoric Theoretical and Methodological Foundations for Studying Rhetoric in Situ. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Na’puti, Tiara R. 2019. “Archipelagic Rhetoric: Remapping the Marianas and Challenging Militarization from ‘A Stirring Place.’” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 16 (1): 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2019.1572905.
Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop. 1995. “The Critique of Vernacular Discourse”. Communication Monographs 62 (1): 19–46.
Ott, Brian L., and Greg Dickinson. 2019. “Redefining Rhetoric: Why Matter Matters”. Journal of Critical Theory 3 (1): 45–81.
Pezzullo, Phaedra C. 2009. Toxic Tourism: Rhetorics of Pollution, Travel, and Environmental Justice. Tuscaloosa, Ala: University of Alabama Press.
Pezzullo, Phaedra C., and Catalina M. de Onís. 2018. “Rethinking Rhetorical Field Methods on a Precarious Planet”. Communication Monographs 85 (1): 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1336780.
Pietrucci, Pamela. 2014. Rhetorical Topographies of Post-Earthquake L’Aquila: Locality, Activism, and Citizenship Engagement. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington. https://dlib.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/26058.
Pietrucci, Pamela. 2016. “Voices from the Seismic Crater in the Trial of The Major Risk Committee: A Local Counternarrative of ‘the L’Aquila Seven’”. Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 8 (2): 261–285.
Prasch, Allison M. 2016. “Toward a Rhetorical Theory of Deixis”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 102 (2): 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2016.1156145.
Rai, Candice. 2016. Democracy’s Lot: Rhetoric, Publics, and the Places of Invention. Tuscaloosa, Ala: University of Alabama Press.
Rai, Candice, and Caroline Gottschalk Druschke. 2018. On Being There: An Introduction to Studying Rhetoric in the Field. In Field Rhetoric: Ethnography, Ecology, and Engagement in the Places of Persuasion, edited by Candice Rai and Caroline Gottschalk Druschke, 1–21. Tuscaloosa, Ala: University of Alabama Press.
Rice, Jenny. 2012. “From Architectonic to Tectonics: Introducing Regional Rhetorics”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 42 (3): 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2012.682831.
Rivers, Nathaniel A. 2015. “Deep Ambivalence and Wild Objects: Toward a Strange Environmental Rhetoric”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 45 (5): 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2015.1086491.
Senda-Cook, Samantha, Aaron Hess, Michael Middleton, Danielle Endres. 2018. Readings in Rhetorical Fieldwork. New York: Routledge.
Shome, Raka. 2003. “Space Matters: The Power and Practice of Space”. Communication Theory 13 (1): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00281.x.
Stewart, Jessie, and Greg Dickinson. 2008. “Enunciating Locality in the Postmodern Suburb: FlatIron Crossing and the Colorado Lifestyle”. Western Journal of Communication 72 (3): 280–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310802210148.
Stormer, Nathan. 2004. “Articulation: A Working Paper on Rhetoric and Taxis”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 90 (3): 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/0033563042000255516.
Stormer, Nathan. 2016. “Rhetoric’s Diverse Materiality: Polythetic Ontology and Genealogy”. Review of Communication 16 (4): 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2016.1207359.
Stormer, Nathan, and Bridie McGreavy. 2017. “Thinking Ecologically About Rhetoric’s Ontology: Capacity, Vulnerability, and Resilience”. Philosophy and Rhetoric 50 (1): 1–25.
Walsh, Lynda, and Casey Boyle. 2017. Topologies As Techniques for a Post-Critical Rhetoric. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 "Res Rhetorica"
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Artykuły publikowane są na lincencji CC BY 4.0. Treść licencji jest dostępna tutaj: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Artykuły opublikowane na licencji CC-BY (wersje postprint) mogą być udostępniane przez autorów każdemu, na dowolnej platformie lub za pośrednictwem dowolnego kanału komunikacyjnego pod warunkiem, że zostały przypisane do Res Rhetorica jako pierwotnego wydawcy.
